“…The school district keeps asking for more money even though its student enrollment continues to decrease each year.”
That is an interesting public perception. It makes a convenient sound bite that some have been eager to use whenever a discussion of taxation arises. Convenient though it may be I am gratified to know that a majority of our community members know that this perception is misleading and false. I say a majority referring to the number of people who helped ISD 166 pass its school levy in November 2010.
To those who don’t believe or don’t know if this perception is false, please consider the following:
. In the past three (3) years ISD 166 has reduced $1.4 million in spending from an already depleted budget.
. Over the past two (2) years the state has promised but thus far failed to deliver (they call it a shift) $1.2 million in state aid. It is unclear whether ISD 166 will ever receive these “shifted” funds.
. In 2002 taxpayers approved a four-year school
levy. ISD 166 has been operating without taxpayer approved levy funding for three full budget cycles. The 2010 approved levy will kick in to next year’s budget cycle.
. Though the school district receives less funding each year due to an inadequate state educational funding scenario and because of the portion of the school budget that is being “shifted,” school leadership is forced (mandated) by state and federal legislation to spend more money even though fewer kids are enrolled.
Though these are but a few examples, they are telltale. The new levy funding will be put to good use and is greatly appreciated. As the new school board takes their seats they will have fewer challenges thanks to the trust our community has placed in school leadership by approving this levy. I would like to extend a thank you to the community for being understanding and helping our schools through a tough time. I would also like to wish the new school board the best of luck.
Eric Kemp
Hovland
Former ISD 166
School Board Treasurer
Leave a Reply