In regards to a proposed or required audit of the financial books of the Cook County Council on Aging, we do not have a problem with an independent audit. However, it should be noticed that the Council on Aging has reduced its dependence on county funds by over 27% in the past five years.
If the county board is implying that we are inefficient with the county’s contribution to our financial operation then I suggest they are not looking at the facts. On the other hand if they feel that the Council on Aging is misusing the county monies received or requested, then an audit seems appropriate.
An audit is expensive, probably $4,000 – $5,000. If we are required to have an audit done, we would have to increase our budget accordingly, assuming the Council on Aging would have to pay for the service.
I do have a problem with the requirement of an audit when we are the recipients of an $80,000 block grant per year. Is this being required of other nonprofits as well, some which are receiving even larger grants from the county funds?
As to Commissioner Doo-Kirk taking issue that the staff received raises instead of paying to have an audit completed, the raises that are in the budgets are cost of living adjustments reflective of what the county gives its employees each year. A few years there were no cost of living adjustments when the county employees received none either.
I find we are very diligent and frugal in our operation. To suggest otherwise by the County Board of Commissioners I find offensive. If an independent audit supports my view then I would expect a public apology by the county board to the staff and the Council on Aging.
Warren Anderson
Treasurer,
Cook County Council on Aging
Leave a Reply