As I see it

Most people trust vaccines because they are rigorously tested and finally approved after many years.

According to available data, the COVID-19 vaccine is actually an mRNA experimental gene therapy, unlike any FDA-approved vaccine on the market today. These experimental vaccines have been tested and are offered to the public under the EUA, Emergency Use Authorization. Drug companies face no liability. The long-term effects, if any, of this gene therapy are still unknown.

Today I see two groups of people who are walking around in fear. Those who fear a virus that, according to the CDC, 99.7 percent (that’s all age groups combined) will survive it, most with mild symptoms.

Then there are those of us who fear a government aligned with profit-driven drug companies and assorted billionaires with a plan to forcibly vaccinate everyone on the planet. Once that precedent is set, many more experimental shots could follow (you know, mutations). The profit potential would be astronomical since these experimental shots can be brought to market in a few months rather than a few years. This tells me that the state of emergency will go on indefinitely, as politicians are generally corrupt and will go along. To rescind the state of emergency would presumably end the experimental vaccinations.

There was a fellow, who you’ve probably never heard of, named Smedley Butler. Major General Butler was America’s most decorated soldier, having won the Medal of Honor twice. After retiring in 1935, he wrote a book entitled, War Is A Racket, and often said that we could end wars by taking out the profit.

I suspect that if the profit were taken out of experimental shots, the emergency would magically end.

The mainstream media could then tell us that raising our vitamin D levels along with C and zinc would help protect us and reduce any COVID-19 symptoms. That Ivermectin or HCQ, along with zinc and an antibiotic have been successful treatments in other countries for severe symptoms. They could also report on how deaths and cases have been exaggerated by changes in reporting, financial incentives, and running PCR tests at elevated cycles. We would also be allowed to know that vaccine makers do NOT claim that the experimental COVID-19 shots prevent transmission, but rather reduce symptoms, so why are reluctant co-workers pressured to take the shot? They could even tell us about the Great Barrington Declaration, signed by over 40,000 medical and health scientists and medical practitioners, urging our economies to reopen and putting an end to these lockdown measures, which have done much more harm than good, while protecting the elderly. This document must be a real threat to big media/drug company profits because they’ve taken extraordinary measures to discredit and bury it. It also explains how to reach herd immunity without vaccines.

Do we want our grandkids to live in a dark world where the state has the power at any time to force them to take experimental vaccines? A world where those who refuse could lose their job, the right to travel or assemble, have their kids taken away, or even locked up. By the way, lockdown is a prison term, not a health term.

Let’s bring those two fearful groups together again as friends and allow those who want the vaccine to take it and those who don’t to refuse it.